17c起草社区

罢谤耻尘辫鈥檚 trans military ban has taken effect.聽

According to , more than 1,000 transgender service members are expected to be discharged immediately, with others given a 30-day window to self-identify. After that, the Department of Defense will review personnel and medical records to identify those who have not come forward voluntarily, who will then also face discharge.聽

Supreme Court says trans ban can go ahead

The trans military ban was set out soon after 罢谤耻尘辫鈥檚 inauguration in January, but lawsuits had paused its enactment.

However, the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled 6鈥�3 in favour of allowing the Trump administration to enforce a ban on trans defence personnel while the legal challenges were ongoing.聽

The decision lifts an earlier injunction, and permits the Department of Defense to immediately begin discharging transgender service members and preventing their enlistment.

Trans people unable of living “honourable, truthful, and disciplined鈥� lives

The signed by President Donald Trump asserts that 鈥渢he Armed Forces have been afflicted with radical gender ideology鈥� and that 鈥渁doption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual鈥檚 sex conflicts with a soldier鈥檚 commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one鈥檚 personal life.鈥�

鈥淎 man鈥檚 assertion that he is a woman, and his requirement that others honor this falsehood, is not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.鈥�

It goes on to say that trans people are not physically or mentally fit for duty, and implies that their presence dilutes 鈥渢he pursuit of military excellence鈥� and represents an ideology harmful to unit cohesion.

Lower courts dismissed these justifications as discriminatory and unsupported by evidence. Appeals courts upheld this view.聽

In their submission to the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice defended the policy by framing it as a medical restriction focused on 鈥済ender dysphoria鈥� rather than a blanket ban on trans people. However, lawyers representing trans service members say the policy鈥檚 language is obviously biased and motivated by animus against trans people, regardless of their medical histories.

Thousands of people affected

No one is sure exactly how many trans and nonbinary people are serving in the military and reserve forces. As trans people are a very small percentage of the population, and many trans people prefer to be stealth, figures have ranged from to . While exact numbers are hard to come by, estimates suggest the policy would affect thousands of active and reservist service members.聽

Several transgender people may be over-represented in the military, enlisting at nearly double the rate of cisgender people. The U.S military offers access to healthcare, an escape from family, and a place for people to affirm or suppress feelings about their gender. A 2016 commissioned by the Pentagon found no evidence that the presence of openly trans people harmed military readiness or cohesion.
The Trump administration has faced sustained criticism from civil rights groups for targeting trans people across various federal policies. These include restrictions on transgender students鈥� participation in school sports, the removal of trans-related content from the Stonewall National Monument website, and executive orders targeting diversity and inclusion programs.

Organisations such as Lambda Legal and the Human Rights Campaign have filed lawsuits challenging the military ban and vowed to continue legal opposition.

In a joint statement, the two organisations said: 鈥淭he military is harmed when discriminatory policies exclude qualified people from service simply because of who they are.鈥�

Legal experts say the cases will likely continue through the courts for several years, leaving the future uncertain for thousands of transgender service members currently in uniform.